Impactos no estudo da escrita produzidos nos textos de graduandos em Letras.

Abstract

Every time, we are making use of writing in our day to day without even realizing what makes us conclude that we do not write by writing, but one with purpose and intentionality. However, students who come to the university have shown serious problems of writing. They claim, including not knowing how to write, since the school does not give them shares of writing, considering effective social practices. These students when faced with the practice of university writing feel helpless because they are being asked to write critically and reflectively, paying attention to the micro-structural features of the text (morphological and syntactic features) and for macro-structural aspects (organization that expresses a shared knowledge, new information, explanation and conclusion). Thus, understanding to the teaching of writing, as an object of teaching and learning, a constant challenge for teachers and students, we at this present research to achieve two objectives: 1) Check how the guidelines corrections received from teacher trainer to incorporate the new versions of the text of the students of Humanities and what kind of correction was used by the teacher, as impacts of teaching and learning of writing about these texts, and 2) Identify the impacts that the disciplines Practice Reading and Production Texts I and II (PLPT) cause the freshmen students in the course of Arts (identified in the design of writing, reading, teaching methodology, cornucting and rewriting). The research is descriptive and interpretative qualitative, whose corpus includes: set of questions representing proposals for social and university writing, students' texts considered Beginner (I), Medium (M) and Proficient (P): in its first and second versions; questionnaire administered by the teacher on the first day of school, discipline PLPT I; questionnaire applied by us in the discipline mentioned, semi-structured interviews conducted with students in focus, discipline PLPT II, and a questionnaire answered by students after having completed subjects in focus. Our research is based on the socio-interactionist approach discursive writing, the results indicate that the academic education offered in the course of Humanities, has caused an impact, although in its infancy, yet the :exts of the students I and M, and the method of university education led to changes on the design of writing and ways of understanding the students' writing I, M and P, as in university they need to read and write beyond what they were requied in Basic Education (EF) and in high school (EM). With these results, we concluded that students come to university bringing with gaps in relation to the macro-and microreflecting, in their texts produced in the academy, which undergo changes after the suggestions of the teacher's rewritten and rewritten students. This leads us to conclude that among the study know about writing and how to write effectively is a great distance. So we can not teach writing, talking about writing that have effectively put the students to write, preferably from different literacy practices not on\y from university but from other social organizations, according to their own needs.