Os recursos cíveis na segunda instância e a imprescindibilidade do domínio dos procedimentos pelo advogado.

Abstract

In this dissertation is analyzed whether the lack of technical knowledge by lawyers working in civil appeals procedure may result in procedural delays and what implication can result of this to the class and the rights of the parties. It's appears that the resources have essential function within the procedural system, because through them the individuals can reach the reconsideration of matters already discussed by other judicial body, assuming that the judges may make mistakes or injustices when sentencing. Methodologically, it will be used literature, consisting mainly of scientific articles and books, as it allows coverage of a range of much wider phenomena. The method used for data analysis consists of the inductive method, ie, starting from particular principles and coming to the generalization as a product of the later work of collecting private data. The research is documented in three chapters: first, its studied the genesis of historical appeals, its concept, its etymological basis, and it is made reference to judicial statements that are subject to appeals and the constitutional significance of these appeals, including its objectives, its effects and their assumptions of admissibility. After it will be listed the resources managed with greater frequency in the three civil chambers of Rio Grande do Norte Supreme Court. As part bidder it finds that the survey results allowed to state that the length of proceedings is not only fait of the judiciary but also result of the inexperience of some lawyers in handling cases before the Court, conducing often on damage to the right of parties who may have impaired their right due to filing misleading.