O reexame necessário como afronta aos princípios constitucionais da isonomia processual e da celeridade.

Abstract

This monographic work has the primary purpose of raising the problem of affront to the principles of equality and procedural review needed quickly by the Institute that has also undergone some changes through law No. 10,352/2001, however did not provide the expected solution for many problems caused by their stay in the code of Civil procedure. The methodological process consisted in a bibliographic review on the subject, object of study, a critical analytical treatment of material researched. For both data were collected through Dooks and articles arranged in legal sites and magazines to facilitate understanding of the theme. Sought a historical recap of the Institute, identifying its conceptualization and the various theories exist regarding their legal nature. Soon after, it was examined whether its object, its chances of falls, as well as exceptions to the requirement of the Office, showing how is your shipment and call-back. Finally, broached the interrelationship between the Institute and the principles of promptness and procedural equality in order to inform the reader the affront brought by review necessary. Finally, an overall analysis about the term principle, its correlation with the Constitution, its definition and finally to investigate the circumstances in which the principles were hurt by featured are existence of review necessary. Considered that the revision of the judgment, necessary implication of the consignment, influences on procedural delay when abarrota of the Judiciary and processes brings prejudice aside when and did not resort, being forced to accept the review.