Análise dos principais conflitos entre a energia e os consumidores nos juizados especiais na COMARCA de Sousa ano de 2008.

Abstract

The deference to consumer rights is the result of the adaptation of legal institutions in social reality, being the product of efforts of legal operators, because their legal status is a social fact. Legal instruments to minimize the damage to consumers' rights are crucial for the proper maintenance of the status of citizen of the consumer. The state itself, by itself or through its dealers is responsible both for providing a continuous service and effective as the injury to the rights of consumers. The objectives of this research consist of the general framework to analyze the consumer relationships between consumers and the concessionaire, in this case ENERGISA. Specifically examining the historical development of principles of legal institutions and bodies responsible for protection of consumer rights, another important aspect is the study of public contracts to grant public, especially the service of electricity supply, the legal possibility and legality interruption of electricity supply from the viewpoint adopted by the legal constitution of 1988 and the Code of Protection and Consumer Protection, Law No. 8078/90 and the consequent civil liability of causing the damage. The ultimate goal is the specific numerical analysis of the procedural handling of lawsuits against ENERGISA two special courts in the District of Sousa by studying the main legal instruments used by consumers. The methodology consists of the methods evolutionary history, comparative-legal and exegetical, this combined with the literature and the procedural handling of the courts. Through this research examined will be how the consumer demand compensation for damage to the judiciary.