As impropriedades da Lei nº 11.705/2008 no que pertine ao crime de embriagues ao volante face ao sistema probatório brasileiro.

Abstract

The company is going through profound changes in human evolution and one of the roles of the legislature is to adapt these innovations to the legal system. Establishing and amending the rules to fit them into the need of the community. Violence in traffic is an ongoing problem that the country faces and why it has become the latest reform of the Brazilian Traffic Code. It appears that this diazepamb the Dry Law. Despite the good intentions of the legislature, the rule seems more accurate, shows that the ambiguity characterizes unconstitutional, contrary to the principle of self-incrimination and not to allow submission of the drivers of the vehicle evidence showing the rate of blood alcohol. Here, this paper aims to demonstrate the impropriety of Law No. 11705/2008 in crimes of drunk-driving evidence before the Brazilian media. In both developed strong research and doctrine were used traditional methods of scientific research, such as legal-exegetic. It was observed that a result as possible resolution to this problem would be adoption of media education, supervision and a generally more efficient with legal support. Finally, it is necessary to resolve the situation in the country, but left evidence that the introduction of a stricter law apparently may not be the best solution.