Delação premiada: uma controvérsia jurídica.

Abstract

This monograph examines the controversies over whistleblower award. So the challenges of this research is aimed at compliance with that principle if it hurts constitutional principles and their use contributes effectively to the fight against organized crime. The goal is to explain the key aspects of the topic under study, as well as perform a detailed analysis of the laws that address this issue in the legal parental rights. Therefore, it is appropriate to issue, since it is embodied in the doctrinal differences on the subject and the need to establish a uno position on the subject, and the search for mechanisms to effectively combat crime in Brazil. To this end, we adopted a method of the deductive approach and technique as the method of interpretation, legal, historical and evolutionary doctrines of literature, articles, magazines and consultation case law in order to present a more theoretical basis. For this purpose the monograph has been divided into three chapters. Thus, the first chapter seeks to establish historical and general denunciation, the second chapter discusses a detailed study of laws covering the institute in question and in turn the third chapter shows the controversies that the implementation of whistle-blowing involves the legal . There is a lack of clarity in the Brazilian legislation that brings award-winning collaboration, since they differ in relation to requirements necessary for the snitch does justice to the benefit. It was found that the whistleblower award violates the legal system to influence the perfidy, not presenting itself as an effective way to combat crime.