Os institutos da suspensão e da interrupção no contrato de trabalho sob a luz da CLT.

Abstract

The present work of course conclusion broaches into its totality the most present debates between the doctriners, doing allusions to the court of justice's point of view, based on chapter IV (of the individual work contract) of the Work Consolidations Laws (CLT). According to 7t h article of the preset Magna Epistle, it explains of a bright and brief way the institutes of the suspension and interruption of the work contract, demonstrating the difference between both of them, taking into consideration that this distinction doesn't was done by CLT. These institutes search to protect the worker, becoming possible the continuation of the contractual relation, enhancing like that, the principle of the continuity of the work contract, staying it unalterable, though, there are changes in the contractor obligations, in the both institutes causing varied effects too. Along of this work we can look several understandings, concluding according to each real case here explained, though we can find situations at the last chapter that, at the beginning, you can't know in which institute it fit in. Here will be analyzed the details of each case, being able to be a hypothesis of suspension as so as interruption. Both have the purpose ro avoid the end of contract, making, however, several effects. The general rule, the suspension consist of total and temporary suppress of all effects of labor contract, except the employ link. The interruption, imply partial and temporary suppress, being keep a link, a salary obligation and to pay money into a Service Times Guarantee Funds - FGTS. As much as suspension as interruption own several types, depend on legal hypothesis, reason that must be analyze in details.