O estatuto do desarmamento e sua aplicabilidade na sociedade brasileira: uma visão analítica de sua ineficiência.

Abstract

Since the beginning the man seeks to defend his life, his tribe and his territory of the aggressions suffered. Nevertheless, it became difficult to defend himself from physically stronger offenders, however with the advent of firearms the weaker men could equal to those of great physical vigor. With the evolution of life in society, were also evolving the firearms, as well as government concern with control of this artifacts. Brazil in 2003, after strong pressures from non-governmental Organizations and the media, promulgated the Law 10.826 popularly entitled Statute of Disarmament, with the pretext of reducing the violence in the country through the prohibition of the trade in firearms, accessories and munitions proposed in a referendum in 2005. However this motion was repelled by the citizens, but the government cheat the popular desire, through banning of firearms possession and a policy of exception in the acquisition of firearms. The Statute of Disarmament has been questioned since its inception, becoming more vigorous the questioning in the last years because of the increase of the violence in the national territory and especially because of the high numbers of homicides caused by shootings of firearms that grow every year in Brazilian society, even with the righteous citizens unarmed. Between the discussions about the failure of the Statute of Disarmament, this study aims, through the informations gathered during the research conducted, to demonstrate the inefficiency of the Disarmament Statute. For the preparation of the present research, will be used the methods deductive, historical and comparative. The procedure will be based on bibliographic research and analysis of books, journals and scientific papers published with an approach on the subject. Therefore, it aims to demonstrate, without exhausting the questions about the theme, the fact that a greater number of firearms legally inserted in society does not result in a higher rate of violence, but in a reduction, moreover, the government, even keeping control of these artifacts, can not impeded that the citizen, thus wanting and fulfilling the requirements, exercise the natural right of defense by means of a firearm.