A ineficácia do Estatuto do Desarmamento na redução da criminalidade no Brasil.

Abstract

Throughout the history of mankind, weapons have played a fundamental role, whether for personal defense or a people, or even to provide for the sustenance of a group or individual. However, many leaders prevented its people from carrying such equipment, Brazil is not far from this reality, from the beginning there were always laws that limited the use of weapons, but such a prohibition was intensified in the twentieth and twenty first century. With the limitations brought by the legislation it is necessary to verify if the objective of the Law has been fulfilled. For this reason, it is necessary to analyze the laws related to this prohibition, with greater emphasis on Law 10.826 / 03, since such a topic always returns to the center of the discussions. With this in mind it aims to understand, in what context the law was created, as well as whether its objectives were achieved, thus verifying if the aforementioned law was ineffective. It is necessary, however, to mention other objectives that are important for the theme, since one must understand the evolution of the history of the laws that speak on the subject, as well as demystify some prejudices that have arisen on the theme. In order to achieve the objectives of the work, a thorough bibliographical analysis is necessary, not forgetting the deductive method. After all the study and research developed, the result was that, firstly, a regulation on the possession and possession of weapons is important, however, as far as the present Statute is concerned, there are many restrictions on the acquisition of a firearm, It was concluded that Law 10,826 / 03 was unsuccessful and its use was unsuccessful in order to reduce firearms crimes in Brazil, since it could not reduce crime in Brazil even after more than ten years of validity.