Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.sti.ufcg.edu.br:8080/jspui/handle/riufcg/15020
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dcterms.abstractThe work entitled "Differentiated tutelage in the face of special civil courts: advance tutelage, precautionary tutelage and supervisory or injunctional tutelage" is eminently theoretical in nature, proceeding directly through a discursive approach. Therefore, dealing with the analysis of the main aspects that have been raised in favor or against the possibility of granting these urgent tutelages in the proceedings before the special courts. With this, a position is taken on the matter, seeking to base itself on the principles that inform urgent protection, as well as on the principles that guide Law N. 9.099/95, thus promoting plausible solutions and, each case judged, meeting the social purposes of the law and the requirements of the common good. The fact that special courts are already endowed with a very brief rite, for the process and judgment of less complex cases, does not prevent the granting of satisfactory or precautionary injunctions. It is seen, this time, in the course of the work that whenever the requirements of the precautionary actions (preparatory or incidental) and the anticipatory guardianships (generic or specific) are present, there will be legal possibility for the formulation of the request and obtaining the measure, especially because there is no incompatibility between those institutes regulated by the Civil Procedure Code with the special courts; on the contrary, they harmonize with the principles of speed and instrumentality and, therefore, with the effectiveness sought by specialized justice.en
dc.creator.IDNOREIRA, K. L. O.pt_BR
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8368529992218448pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1ABRANTES, Giorggia Petrucce Lacerda e Silva.
dc.contributor.advisor1IDABRANTES, G. P. L. S.pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4116316852116492pt_BR
dc.description.resumo0 trabalho intitulado "As tutelas diferenciadas em face dos juizados especiais cíveis: tutela antecipada, tutela cautelar e tutela monitoria ou injuncional" apresenta natureza eminentemente teórica, procedido de forma direta, mediante abordagem discursiva. Versando, portanto, acerca da analise dos principais aspectos que tem sido levantados a favor ou contra a possibilidade de concessão destas tutelas urgentes nos processos perante os juizados especiais. Com isto, toma-se posição quanto a matéria, buscando fundamentação nos princípios informadores das tutelas urgentes, bem como nos princípios que norteiam a Lei n. 9.099/95, promovendo, assim, soluções plausíveis e, cada caso julgado, atendendo aos fins sociais da lei e as exigências do bem comum. O fato dos juizados especiais já serem dotados de um rito sumaríssimo, para o processo e julgamento de causas de menor complexidade, não obsta a concessão de liminares satisfativas ou cautelares. Vê-se, desta feita, no transcorrer do trabalho que sempre que os requisitos das ações cautelares (preparatórias ou incidentais) e das tutelas antecipatórias (genérica ou especifica) se fizerem presentes haverá possibilidade jurídica para a formulação do pedido e obtenção da medida, mormente porque inexiste qualquer incompatibilidade entre esses institutos regulados pelo Código de Processo Civil com os juizados especiais; pelo contrario, harmonizam-se com os princípios da celeridade e instrumentalidade e, por conseguinte, com a efetividade buscada pela justiça especializada.pt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentCentro de Ciências Jurídicas e Sociais - CCJSpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFCGpt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqDireito Processual Civil
dc.titleAs tutelas diferenciadas em face dos juizados especiais cíveis: tutela antecipada, tutela cautelar e tutela monitória ou injucional.pt_BR
dc.date.issued2005
dc.description.abstractThe work entitled "Differentiated tutelage in the face of special civil courts: advance tutelage, precautionary tutelage and supervisory or injunctional tutelage" is eminently theoretical in nature, proceeding directly through a discursive approach. Therefore, dealing with the analysis of the main aspects that have been raised in favor or against the possibility of granting these urgent tutelages in the proceedings before the special courts. With this, a position is taken on the matter, seeking to base itself on the principles that inform urgent protection, as well as on the principles that guide Law N. 9.099/95, thus promoting plausible solutions and, each case judged, meeting the social purposes of the law and the requirements of the common good. The fact that special courts are already endowed with a very brief rite, for the process and judgment of less complex cases, does not prevent the granting of satisfactory or precautionary injunctions. It is seen, this time, in the course of the work that whenever the requirements of the precautionary actions (preparatory or incidental) and the anticipatory guardianships (generic or specific) are present, there will be legal possibility for the formulation of the request and obtaining the measure, especially because there is no incompatibility between those institutes regulated by the Civil Procedure Code with the special courts; on the contrary, they harmonize with the principles of speed and instrumentality and, therefore, with the effectiveness sought by specialized justice.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.sti.ufcg.edu.br:8080/jspui/handle/riufcg/15020
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-08T18:39:08Z
dc.date.available2020-09-08
dc.date.available2020-09-08T18:39:08Z
dc.typeTrabalho de Conclusão de Cursopt_BR
dc.subjectTutela Antecipada
dc.subjectTutela Cautelar
dc.subjectTutela Monitória ou Injucional
dc.subjectJuizados Especiais Federais
dc.subjectCódigo de Processo Civil
dc.subjectDireito Processual Civil
dc.subjectAnticipated Guardianship
dc.subjectGuardianship
dc.subjectMonitorial or Injunctive Guardianship
dc.subjectFederal Special Courts
dc.subjectCode of Civil Procedure
dc.subjectCivil Procedural Law
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.creatorMOREIRA, Kaline Lima de Oliveira.
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Campina Grandept_BR
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.title.alternativeDifferentiated tutelage in the face of special civil courts: early tutelage, precautionary tutelage and monitoring or injunctive tutelage.pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationMOREIRA, Kaline Lima de Oliveira. As tutelas diferenciadas em face dos juizados especiais cíveis: tutela antecipada, tutela cautelar e tutela monitória ou injucional. 48f. (Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso - Monografia), Curso de Especialização em Direito Processual Civil – Centro de Ciências Jurídicas e Sociais, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande – Sousa - Paraíba - Brasil, 2005.pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Especialização em Direito Processual Civil

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
KALINE LIMA DE OLIVEIRA MOREIRA - ESPECIALIZAÇÃO EM DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL 2005.pdfKaline Lima de Oliveira Moreira-TCC 2005.6.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.