Considerações constitucionais acerca da exigibilidade das promessas de campanha eleitoral no cenário jurídico-social contemporâneo brasileiro.

Abstract

From the moment you check in society a dissatisfaction with the increasing corruption, wide open by scandals such as the monthly allowance and car wash, worrying about the origin, with Hatcher that badly. It is very common in the current Brazilian electoral scenario the perception of promises that constitute the ideological political management material, say, campaign promises. However, there is a big political and legal barrier to recognize and address the issues relevant to the Institute in comment under the normative bias, that is, there is no legal regulation to safeguard these promises are actually implemented eleitoreiras When the arrival to the elective mandate. See if the promises is observed the beginning of a political action anchored by corruption. The present work intends to discuss policies and search in the Constitution promises the best way to check any accountability to politicians who make them without any commitment. In this fire, this work has for objective to analyze the constitutional basis for general the requirement of campaign promises. And, understand the principles that govern the legal system as plausible grounds to seek the tutelage of promises, draw a comparison between whether the right situations, like promises, bring a legal analysis of PEC nº 10/2011, seeking a form of accountability by the spread of policy proposals unfeasible, and demonstrate the role of the political party of the candidate's performance. For both, the methodological procedures used in the construction and research of this work were, as the deductive approach method and procedure, comparative methods and legal Exegetical. As a technique of research, we used the qualitative, through indirect documentation by means of bibliographical research. That noted, although the Brazilian legal system does not provide for specific rule governing the campaign promises, regarding your compliance, you can remove the basis for the requirement of your own Constitution, the principles applicable. Though not intended to formulate the idea that these alone are enough, by contrast, sought to demonstrate the need to fill that gap through normative regulation, in order to ensure a decent electoral process, and that the campaign promises, are not just words involved, but out of the paper.