Aplicação de diferentes procedimentos de votação para agregar as decisões em grupo tomadas no âmbito dos orçamentos participativos.

Abstract

Voting procedures are directly connected with the decision-making process, and become more evident when those decisions are made collectively, knowing that we sought to evaluate and simulate some of the voting procedures in order to ascertain the impact of in the same aggregation of preferences of the decisions taken in groups, with emphasis on 5th geoadministrativa region of the Democratic State of Paraiba budget. It was initially conducted a study and then a simulation with key voting procedures found in the literature, to conduct an assessment and comparison between them. From this evaluation it was possible to notice the simplicity of the voting procedure known as pluralist system, a procedure already used in several situations, but also compare it to the others through simulations involving the same alternatives already on the State of the Democratic budget, and the same target audience of the program. It was demonstrated by the results, the best ways to gauge the collective will, with the use of other voting procedures other than the pluralistic system such as Condorcet procedure, Copeland procedure, Borda Procedure, Balanced and Unbalanced Scale Linguist etc.