FREITAS, S. A. X.; FREITAS, Suely Azevedo Xavier.
Résumé:
With the objective to almost retake the quarrel on the importance of the Institution of the Jury, question that asleep, one takes in consideration the points that more are accented. For in such a way, it is tried to display of simple and objective form, by means of the exegetico-juridico job of methods and description-evolutivo, through a theoretical and legal recital, some lines regarding the Institution, as well as traces of its structure and previous constitutional previsibility the 1988, as well as the agreement of the originary constituent stops with the Court of the People, detaching its guarantees. It is standed out influence of "a garantista" position for the native order, that consubstancia an advance in the very old code of criminal procedure, in special, in that it refers to the Popular Court, in view of a system each time more just. Moreover, an analysis concerning the projects of law that aim at the reform of the court of the Jury, as well as the perspectives of future of exactly is imperious. Finally, it is concluded evaluating the positionings in relation the Institution, having as base the arguments the favor and against the permanence of the same one, extolling the structuralized vision that they believe the Court of the Jury and fight in its favor.
