ROLIM FILHO, A. B.; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6610606792412286; ROLIM FILHO, Antonio Braz.
Resumo:
The penalties restricting rights, gender, which is part of the cash benefit, they
symbolize the minimalist ideal sought by the current criminal justice system, due to
the failure of the custodial sentence. However, it is noticed that the cash benefit, in
addition to the features less invasive, the desired profile of reprimands substitute, has
a reparative nature calendar, which casts doubt on its practicality as a penalty. So
overall goal of this research is to analyze the character of the retributive and
deterrent replacement of deprivation of freedom by applying single cash benefit in
favor of victims of crime. In turn, specific objectives are: identify the main historical
aspects of alternative sanctions, particularly the financial penalty; differentiate the
species of legal liability arising through criminal offense and also to identify the
situations in which the cash benefit may be confused with liability of the author, in the
face of a criminal offense committed. To enable the construction of the theoretical
aspects of the monograph, pursuing the goals listed, is employed as a research
method and the abstract-deductive method as the procedural and legal exegesis,
aided by the historicai-evolutionary, doing everything by using the search technique
literature applied to legal texts, doctrinal, jurisprudential and scientific. As a result,
through the theoretical development grounded in specialized reference materials on
the issue, we have that the cash benefit, when applied in isolation and intended to
hurt, is mere anticipation of possible indemnification civil, characterizing themselves
as well as a penalty for the loss of preventive and retributive effects that characterize
this kind of sanction.