PEREIRA, I. J. L.; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5105523427105718; PEREIRA, Ítalo José Leite.
Résumé:
This monographic work search to argue problematic the referring one to the use of
the videoconferencia in the interrogation of the defendant. In this way, the related
research tries to analyze if the definitive technological mechanism disrespects certain
basic guarantees and constitutional assured by the Federal Constitution of Brazil of
1988. Also some brought advantages are shown, for the videoconferencia, to the
judiciary Brazilian. In this direction, it must be mentioned that the use of technological
instruments, in the legal way, finishes generating a bigger celeridade, economy and
security, to the process as a whole. However, the deriving advantages of such
modern tools cannot never violate the inherent rights to counsel to the male
defendant. The methods used for the accomplishment of this academic work had
been bibliographical and the legal exegetico, having these, the purpose biggest to
emphasize the problematic one and to develop the cited monograph. For the best
understanding of the alluded subject, the positionings of some specialized Brazilian
authors in the criminal area had been used. With this, it can be arrived the referring
logical conclusions at the application of the videoconferencia in the teleinterrogatorio.
In the development of the related work the laws had been made some related
commentaries n° 11,819/05 and 11,900/09, in the direction to analyze
unconstitutionality, or not, of the videoconferencia in the Brazilian criminal
proceeding, and more specifically, in the phase of the interrogation of the defendant.
Therefore, it can be said that the videoconferencia provides a series of benefits to the
native legal system, however, at the same time, it is inconceivable that in a
democratic state of right the ways of defense it male defendant are, of some form,
disrespected.