VIEIRA, T. D. P.; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4858758636161134; VIEIRA, Theófilo Danilo Pereira.
Resumo:
Whoever it was used the commercial agency agreement to forge an autonomous
legal relationship that would actually be a contract of employment in the role of
outside salesman, affront the constitutional principles of human dignity and social
rights, specifically the right to work . In the present study has as objective to
distinguish the nature of contracts, from the laws, evaluating the area under the
Enterprise Law, but labor law by promoting understanding of the factual and legal
matters that will lead to understanding that the contract was actually signed. Thus,
Usage is the comparative method to evaluate the rights emanating from the labor
supply, and the deductive method for general analysis of the employment contract
fraud by a business; The research technique is the bibliographic and legal-exegetical
method will bring presentation of law and the Justices of the Courts homelands, who
disapprove of fraudulent practice sometimes mentioned. This work was divided into
three chapters, the first chapter is a general approach on the general theory of
business contracts, presenting the concept and characteristics peculiar to the
contract business, its principles and the legal informants.In the second chapter is set
out the contract sales representation business, with its peculiarities contractual
parties, the same obligations, and legal treatment given by Law No. 4886/65, by the
third chapter will be unveiled the bond that separates the business of contract
commercial representation of employment in the role of outside salesman. As a
result, it emerges that the dealer agreements can in no way be compared to an
employment contract in the role of outside salesman, due to lack of representation in
contract commercial element subordination.