CUNHA, E. S.; http://lattes.cnpq.br/8123579359691741; CUNHA, Érica Sampaio.
Resumo:
The termrelativityrefersto the possibility ofreview offinal judgments. It maybe noted
thatthis flexibilityisthe subject of numerousdiscussionsand eventuallyled to
thehypothesis ofres judicatabe revisedeven withthe expirationofaction for
rescissionagainst the needtoassure the rightsand guaranteesin the solutionof
disputes andas well ascurtailingthe activities ofunjust sentencesfor time/Throughout
this research, we intend to present the importance ofrelativization ofres judicataincivil
procedure, identifying casesthat maybe the object ofhis performance, as it isto
understandthe effectivenessof justicethrough therelativization ofres judicata. The line
of reasoningadoptedin the research processwasdeveloped from thedeductive
method. The methodological approachof thisstudy was conductedthroughliterature
reviewcoveringthe reading, analysis and interpretation of relevant
contentknowledgeand developmentof the theme. As ageneral goal.there wouldbethe
possibilityofrelativization ofres judicatainthe contextof civil procedure. Specifically, we
intend to submitan ideaabout therelativityofres judicataand the principle
ofimmutability,identify in whichcasesthe processcan be relativizedand understand
howthe effectivenessof justiceoccursthroughrelativization. You can checkthat
thejurisdictional activityis recognized asoneof the functionsof state powerresponsible
forresolvingconflicts thatarepresentedto itby the formationofres judicata, to the
performanceof the principle oflegal certainty.