ARAÚJO, G. B.; ARAÚJO, Genivaldo Bernardino de.
Résumé:
This cientifica research if considers to deal with the institute of the Public
prosecution service, permanent, essential institution to the jurisdictional function of
the State, charging to it prohibited it of the jurisprudence, the democratic system
and unavailable the social and individual interests, as it makes use article 127 of
the Federal Constitution of 1988. It discourses on the possibility of its
investigatorio power, bringing arguments that support this power. For intermediary
of the exegetico-legal method, that if uses of the consultation of codes, doctrines,
jurisprudences and removed articles of the Internet, the paper of the Public
prosecution service will be approached, in regards to its historical evolution,
concept, legal nature, legal grounds, procedural aspects, amplitude of being able
and limitations constitutional. By means of the study it will be objectified to
contribute for the briefing of the subject in the scope of Legal Science. With
respect to being able attributed them, constitutionally, to the Public prosecution
service, the excited legal divergences in the doctrine will be presented, atinente to
the possibility of inquiry in the criminal scope. By means of the analysis of
jurisprudenciais arguments approach to the fact will be given of that, the criminal
inquiry does not constitute privative activity of no institution, but responsibility
charged to all, either the Judiciary Policy, Federal Policy, the Public prosecution
service, or even though the particular one. In short, with this scientific research it
will be figured relevance of the social function of the Parquet in the pre-trial phase
as form to intensify and to speed up the criminal conclusions with bigger efficiency.