MELO, T. N.; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5931368648134195; MELO, Thalya da Nóbrega.
Resumo:
The present study approaches the affirmative action that are an instrument created to
minimize discrimination of any nature, which, over the years, permeate the Brazilian
society, aiming at the implementation of material equality. The main objective of the
research is verifying the applicability of the Principle of Material Equality to affirmative
action, making them more and more useful and able to treat the unequal in the
measure of inequalities, be it through normative collaborations or the implementation
of public policies. It is also configured as the object of this research, the detailed
analysis of the restrictions on age, sex and height in the Civil and Military Police and
the Fire Department of the State of Paraíba, in the years 2003, 2008, 2014 and 2018.
The work was developed through the deductive method and evolutionary history,
through a qualitative approach to the selected theme. A case study was also carried
out, based on the presented, exploratory that is, focused on the research questions
that surround the theme. For the construction of this study, we used the most diverse
sources of research, example, doctrine, legislation, documents and direct sources,
since it is a bibliographical and documentary research. The subject raised is
interdisciplinary way, making it essential to study the subject of the nonstandardization of the same by the courts, leaving many questions to be raised about
the subject. The research also brought as a central problem the question of the legal
parameters for restrictions on public contests in the State of Paraíba, taking into
account the cited edicts and how the theme is regulated from the Constitutional point
of view. Lastly, some of the results of this study are presented, the achievement of
the proposed objectives, and essentially, the assurance that the edicts that the of the
analyzed competitions find a base and support in the current Federal Constitution,
attending also the infraconstitucional regulations, and the fact that the matter is not
unified for the Member States of the Federation, nor in the superior Brazilian courts.