QUEIROGA, H. M.; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1080368819461218; QUEIROGA, Heitor Moreira de.
Abstract:
This study aims to address the issue of fundamental rights within the current legal
framework regarding the application of such rights within the private relations. It will be
shown through a hypothetical-deductive approach and a historical-evolutionary
procedure that such an application must be made through the use of the proportionality
principle, as several bibliographical research points. Thus, it is possible by means of
the solution of the weighting technique for possible conflicts that exist between these
standards, that is, with the values reflection a fundamental rule over the other. The
legal argument is the validator of such a decision, which will be valid for the principle
of human dignity, which is the main north in resolving such conflicts. It will still be shown
as fundamental rights won this highlight within the current legal system, showing its
evolution from jus naturalism, through positivism, to find support with
neoconstitucionalist movement (post-positivist) that came with the end of World War
II. Show It will also milestones that influenced the imposition of this new chain and its
main meanings, culminating thus a concept that is more accepted. It will also be treated
which are fundamental rights and what is its difference in relation to human rights and
human rights, as it did its emergence from the French Revolution and the kind of
effectiveness more accepted, in spite exist to mediate chain and the immediate chain,
this is subdivided horizontally and vertically. Remain shown that the most correct is the
theory of immediacy, since such rights should always be secured inside a concrete
situation, being the judicial decision that will be valid law "most important" in relation to
another.