A (des) moralização do conceito de perversão.

Abstract

This work purposes a reflection about the moralization of the concept of perversion based on a structural perspective. From authors such as Jacques Lacan e Alfredo Eidelsztein we sought to point out some factors that influenced the misunderstandings that surround such theme, especially in the psychoanalytic community. Throughout the survey, we discussed elements that are contemporary to the semantic origin of the word as a link to the concept of perversity as well as the introduction of the subject in psychoanalysis from the Freudian perspective. Therefore, we used texts such as seminars Anguish (book 10) and The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis (book 11) which were of fundamental importance to support the hypothesis that perversion in Lacan is not confused with morality. Considering that we did not deepen into the definition of the term, the main focus of such research took place around the reflection with reference to the place that perversion takes in the psychoanalysis speech and of most of the psychoanalysts who insist on "evaluate it" from a moral and individual perspective, since we know that in Lacan, "analysis" is not done with individuals and nor it is used diagnostic for docket.