SOUZA, F. R.; http://lattes.cnpq.br/8734113911810487; SOUZA, Francisca Regiane de.
Resumo:
Health is a good that affects the very livelihood of the people, without which one can
not speak of human being, therefore, anyone who suffers can not satisfy any need,
since that meets their biological components and physical without adequately
respond to the pressing survival needs.With the CRFB/88 access to health has been
enshrined as a universal right, public, free and full to every Brazilian citizen. There
has been a number of advances in the right to health in Brazil, but due to the
exponential increase in demand and financial resource, there was also been
setbacks, especially demonstrated by the high number of lawsuits in which the user
claims a right to have it is guaranteed by CRFB / 88, but that was denied. That way, it
comes what is called the legalization of the right to health that is, the possibility of the
judiciary intervention in public Executive policies determining in some cases, the user
needs to survive. Before the study Will have as a general objective to analyze the
evolution of access to public health in Brazil , pointing out the advances and setbacks
, seeking evidence judicialization as altenative means for the realization of the right to
health. Specifically, it will seek to understand what the State's actions to promote
access to health law in certain moments of history; to list relevant points of SUS
legislation; mention the importance of the principles for building an efficient and
effective health; some considerations about the National Health System in Brazil;
pointing out the challenges and setbacks ; and addresses the legalization as an
alternative to guarantee the right to health, making it effective. Therefore, the
monographic work focuses on a thematic extremely relevant today, because the right
to health suffered an important historical development in the consolidation of human
rights, however, due to the difficulties in the execution of public health policies,
insufficient investment of services, lack of medicines, finally, the challenges of the
SUS and seen setbacks, judicialization proved as an alternative to effectiveness of a
repressed right.