LAURENTINO, S. M. R.; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1080677620119202; LAURENTINO, Sarah Martins Rodrigues.
Resumo:
This monograph underpins the fragility of formation of jurors’ inner conviction in the
Jury Court, as components of the Sentence Council, on the grounds of the influences
from the media and society in the crimes of great impact. Resulting in disregard for the
principle of innocence presumption and convictions based on eminently subjective
criteria, disregarding the evidence established on the records. It was analyzed the
historical evolution of the jury court, its principles, as well as informants throughout the
procedure for the processing of intentional crimes against life in the grand jury. During
the paper, set the left media influence and society in the jury’s opinion in the trial of
great impact crimes, and, therefore, this research main objective is to analyze the
impossibility of the jurors remain impartial until they are ready to give their position at
the trial of crimes that lead to big social commotion. It also elucidated, in each case,
the evidence of these external influences to, eventually, propose solutions that can
reduce or eradicate such interference in the formation of jurors’ inner conviction. The
relevance of this theme come true because of the consequences that may be caused
directly in defendant’s life, in his or her liberty. As well as in the legal uncertainty
brought by inner conviction to the principle of jury court, in order to be able to depart
from the legal barriers imposed by the subjective and procedural law. For this purpose,
the methods of inductive and historical approach were used, as well as existing laws,
doctrines, articles, stories, news, jurisprudence of higher courts and online queries
regarding the theme.