SANTOS, R. A. L.; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3989138281676610; SANTOS, Rai Artemis Lins dos.
Resumen:
This monograph aims to emphasize the effectiveness of representation and the use
of the principle of indivisibility in the conditioned public prosecution. It is known that
the institution of criminal proceedings has an abysmal importance to the legal
science, being an effective power of the state to carry out the purpose of criminal law
to a specific case. Thus, it is the State responsibility particularly when it comes to
criminal science reconcile disagreements that are caused by society. Some
positivized crimes in the Brazilian Penal Code require a representation to that from
there the owner of prosecution (prosecutor) can proceed with due process. There is
discussion in the public prosecution conditional on representation when representing
offended against one of the co-authors of the offense is silent as to others. It asked if,
in this situation, the public prosecutor has the perk, regardless of the victim's
permission, can enroll to process other individuals who proven (having just cause)
participated in the criminal activity. Mostly the doctrine says that just as in the private
prosecution, where the principle of indivisibility force arguably should be public action
applied the same precept. The lack of regulation of the use or not of such a principle
promotes one doutrine-judicial obstacle that to this day has a certain instability as its
use. When referring to the Supreme Court today peacefully, this kind of thinking
changes completely, because it says in its decision that the effectiveness that should
be used by the prosecutor will be objective, ie not taking public action indivisibility,
having full right parquet, according to his understanding denounce the other coauthors. This observed, and through a characteristically bibliographic study, taking
into account the case-law decisions, magazines, papers, following a guided approach
to the comparative method, particularly if it made it possible to analyze the legal
aspects of the objective efficacy and whether or not to apply principle of indivisibility
in the conditioned public prosecution.