SILVA, T. L. A.; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3574115356736914; SILVA, Thaysa Louyse Alves.
Resumen:
This research aims to analyze one of the alternative forms of dispute resolution,
namely conciliation. The main focus is on efficiency and promptness. Such institute
has great importance, because it acts as an instrument to achieve social peace.
Faced with a procedural demand increasingly growing day, based on a legal culture
of opponents seeking the settlement of disputes by means of a judgment given by a
judge, there is a stillness of the Brazilian courts in their adjudication. The alternative
means of conflict resolution enable the speed, transparency and, above all, effective
access to justice. Throughout the work will be an analysis of the historical evolution of
access to justice. Then we analyze the Conciliation Institute: its historical evolution,
guiding principles, beyond the role of all parties, especially the Conciliator, the
conciliatory attempt, and a brief analysis of the institute in the new Civil Procedure
Code. Finally, we will treat on the Resolution no. 125 of the National Council of
Justice, establishing significant guidelines for the practice of conciliation in the
judiciary, aiming at a more appropriate treatment demands. Thus remain proven the
importance of reconciliation as an instrument to assist in the adjudication of the
State, in that it meets the interests of the parties to quickly and reduces the volume of
cases of registries, revealing itself as an effective measure to combat slowness.
