MENDES, A. M. G.; MENDES, Allan Martinne Gonçalves.
Résumé:
Society is more concerned with environmental issues, charging organizations, attitudes
related to environmental preservation, since these are directly responsible for the impacts
resulting from their activities on the environment. And one of the main factors that contribute
to air pollution is the emission of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2) which
aggravates the greenhouse effect, caused mainly by business activities. Thus, the rights and
environmental obligations should be measured in financial statements of the company,
especially its carbon credits. In this regard, the main objective of this work was to
demonstrate the environmental assets and liabilities, and the accounting of carbon credits
from company Nestlé, using quantitative models to appreciate the avoided emissions of gas
carbon. When is used in the proceedings methodological a study of the descriptive type, with
deductive-hypothetical method. With approach of qualitative and quantitative nature. So, it
was observing in the reports of sustainability of Nestlé, Investments in products, as well as
packages that reduce the emission of pollutants and gases aggressors to the environment. It
is possible to identify and analyze vertically and horizontally of the environmental indicators,
related to water, energy, gas emissions, among others. There is, a considerable variation in
the reduction of these indicators, between these years analyzed by 2011 compared to the
year 2012. Regarding the accounting of carbon credits apt trading on the Stock Exchange
and can say that in the years 2011 and 2012 financial years was counting the amount of CO2
avoided, so that the company had millions of carbon credits that could be traded in the
market internationally. Given the above, it is stated that Nestlé Public voluntarily and
accounts for their environmental actions, despite not measures them in their financial
statements, but it is no longer recognize their carbon credits an intangible asset. It is clear,
therefore, through the results obtained that this issue needs to be widely discussed, because
there are different practices on the part of the Nestlé regarding the accounting treatment and
its application in operations with carbon credits and that these treatments should be
regulated by government as well as accounting and government.