FIGUEREDO, A. C. M.; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0139697458685036; FIGUEREDO, Antonia Carla Maciel de.
Résumé:
The state has a constitutional duty to promote the rights and fundamental guarantees
in favor of all persons, with no distinction, thus, when the need arises to protect the
individual, the State must act cohesively applying the best protective measures in
order to faithfully fulfill its role. This intention was created the Law 11.340/2006,
known as “Maria da Penha” Law, which aims protect women victims of domestic and
familiar violence. However, much has been discussed regarding the applicability of
this for male victims, mainly when is faced a homosexual relationship, an issue that
has generated a lot of judicial and doctrinal controversies. Understand that the Maria
da Penha Law can only protect women, shows real affront to the postulates of
Isonomy and Human Dignity, not to mention that restricts the real purpose of this
standard, what is to prevent and end with family violence, safeguarding the
stronghold of society, this is, the family, as a result, with the expansion of the concept
of family given by the Supreme Court, the homoafetival male relationships should
also have protection of the 11.340/06 Law. Given the importance of this topic, this
study evaluates the hermeneutic processes authorizing the judiciary to apply the
Maria da Penha Law for homosexual male relationships. For this, was utilized as
methodological method was used deductive approach procedure the literature
search, thus seeking to identify in this study the possibility of recognizing the legal
hermeneutics to protect male subjects that form a family entity.