ANDRADE, D. A.; ANDRADE, Daniell Alves de.
Resumen:
This monograph examines the feasibility of applying retroactive prescription virtual
institute which is a form of retroactive prescription that occurs in advance, taking into
account a notional sentence that the defendant would receive if convicted. This topic
is of great discussion and doctrinal differences among the courts as to its use, to its
proponents, involves respecting the various constitutional principles, including the
speed of the procedure. As for those who oppose its applicability, this institute would
violate some constitutional principles such as legality. The subject is closely related
to claim punitive state, which is the power / duty that the State has to apply criminal
sanctions those who violate the law, and their loss that occurs with the causes of
criminality extintivas. Being one of the most controversial prescription and
commented, extintivas causes of criminality, to occur due to the inertia of the judiciary
in judging course that leaves large time gap. Generates further divergence virtual
prescription for not having legal provision and relying on a supposed penalty that the
accused would receive. The methodology is used, the hypothetical-deductive
method, the comparative literature and to research and study these issues. The
results demonstrate that the research shows that the use of virtual prescription must
be complied with to improve the functionality of the judiciary and respect the
principles of the law, among them the dignity of the human person and the speed of
the procedure.