PEDROSA JÚNIOR, N. S.; PEDROSA JÙNIOR, Neirrobisson de Souza.
Résumé:
The administrative misconduct is an act that has always existed in Brazil as one of the biggest
detriments to society, where managers of public abuse their power to benefit and their benefit.
A fact that the country is divided between a small party that dominates, while there is another
part that experiences all the hardships brought by poor administration. To change this
situation and relying on the dissatisfaction of the population, the Constitution of 1988 in its
new structure came appropriately punishing illegal actions committed by those who should
care for probity. In this sense, this research aimed to contextualize the accountability of
officials elected by the people, the law of misconduct, including the activeness of the
Judiciary. For that was conducting a survey of jurisprudence where it identified the main and
most ordinary types of illegality found in contracts. It was also used in this work the
procedure monographic because it allowed an analysis on the subject in all its aspects and
angles, thus providing a more comprehensive view of all the factors that influence it. The type
of research technique applied in this work was to bibliographic and documentary. With this
research it became apparent that this is an issue inherent to the administration and
management of public affairs, and that the Law of misconduct serves to fight effectively, or at
least reduce corruption, illegal and immoral behaviors practiced by those who hide behind the
role they play, giving a greater focus on the illegality existing contracts