SILVA, D. P. A.; SILVA, Dominik Pereira Araújo.
Résumé:
Labor rights are a constant subject of studies, given the relevance they assume in the legal
scenario today. There are several contexts that encompass the various theoretical debates in
the labor legislative sphere, whether in the economic, political, legal or social spheres. These
modifications caused impacts, mainly, in the possibility of postulatory actions generating an
impasse before provisions protected in the Federal Constitution under the tutelage of a stone
clause. In this interregnum, its purpose is to discuss the consequences suffered in the legalsocial
sphere and how it behaved in the face of new legal perspectives, from the political
scenario, the doctrine and the comprehensibility in the courts based on a rule that goes against
what is preserved in the Magna Letter. The research carried out is qualitative in nature, based
on exploratory research, through bibliographic review. The method of approach chosen is
deductive, and the procedure is historical. Thus, it is extremely important to clarify the main
points that generate discomfort in the most vulnerable working class, so that they can be
reversed or minimized. The focus is on limiting free justice after labor reform and how this
change affected the organizational structure in the legal sphere, as well as in the politicalsocial
field, since the thesis now defended is relevant to the context of Brazilian law. It is
necessary to recognize the importance of the considerations focused on Law 13.467 / 17 and
its consequences, as it generated consequences in the procedural dialogues and the imminent
withdrawal of workers' rights, in a cohesive and scientific way.
