GUEDES, L. F. M.; GUEDES, Luiz Fábio Marques.
Resumo:
This study was conducted in the State School for Elementary and Middle Venancio Orlando
dos Santos. The sample used in this study consisted of 36 adolescents aged between 14 and
a 19-year-old living in the city o f Cuité PB, these students of I st year o f high school. This
work aimed to compare which language could bc more attractive: the television language or
the language used by teachers in school. For it was necessary to understand the arguments
made by the students. To carry out this work were applied questionnaires with closed and
open questions that served as guiding the development and understanding of the research.
Overall results on the socioeconomic status of students, found that family income of the
majority of students interviewed ranged between one and two rninimum wages and income
for the origin of which is prevalent arnong households with formal work, and the Most
students do not exercise any paid job. With regard to housing the majority of students live in
their own houses, and over half are Jocated in urban areas. Television was the only electronic
device found in every home. Most of the students always accesses the internet. A significant
nun1ber of students have read more than four books (scientific or literary), and over half havc
already failed at least once and most students took notes as below average in 2011. Overall
results on the comparison between language and school language television: Most parents do
not seem to exercise a mediating position in relation to the time that children devote to
television consumption and school activities. Most students said that television can arouses
your attention and consider the language television more attractive than the language used by
teachers in lectures. Most o f the students find the classes attractive. but more than half are not
satisfied with the way the contents are worked in the classroom. The results therefore suggest
that television through the use of colors, images, sounds and language content approaching
the daily life of students is taking on a role of non-formal educator, and its power to act in the
training process much more effective than the academic institution that acts almost always
based on the use o f writing and textbooks.