SOUZA, J. M.; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9120546033182086; SOUZA, Jaidete Monteiro de.
Abstract:
In this research. the impact of the estimated potential evapotranspiration (ETP) on river
discharge. actual evapotranspiration and soil humidity. which were determined by using a
general hydrological model (GMH) is evaluated. The daily and monthly climatological
data were used to estimate the potential evapotranspiration by means of the empirical
equations and also to initialize the hydrological model. The global solar radiation data for
the month of September. 1997 was obtained from the global solar radiation estimation
model. GL 1.0. The model GL 1.0 utilizes the data from the VIS channel of GOES-8. Also
used were the hydrological data of precipitation and river discharge of the sub-basins 37
and 38 of the hydrographic basin 3 which is located in the Northeast Brazil. The
methodology involved the following steps: 1) spatial regionalization of the potential
evapotrasnpiration using the method of WARD which is available on SPSS (Statistical
Package for the Social Sciences) software: 2) corrclation bctween the potential
evapotranspiration values estimated from the methods of Jensen & Haise - MJH (1963).
Caselles et al. - MCA (1992) and the method of Penman - MP (1948). respectively. were
obtained: 3) tests of sensibility of the empirical formulations proposed by Jensen & Haise MJH (1963) and Caselles et al. - MCA (1992) as a function of the changes in the surfacc
global solar radiation and the air temperature: 4)simulation of the general hydrological
model for the sub-basin 37 and 38. considering the different methods of estimation of the
potential evapotranspiration and the evaluation of the correction coefficient in the
estimation of the potential evapotranspiration: and. 5) estimation of the actual
evapotrasnpiration. soil humidity and the discharge using the GHM. MCA and the global
solar radiation data. The general hydrological model was developed for the South America
with a spatial resolution of 0.5° x 0.5°. The sensibility tests showed the method of
estimation of ETP influenced the discharge rates calculated for the regions where the
precipitation values are very close to those of the ETP. The estimates of actual
evapotrasnpiration. soil humidity and river discharge. obtained from the hydrological
model. presents satisfactory results with a maximum error of 20% when compared with the
estimates obtained from the satellite data.