ANDRADE, J. H. P.; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9757480214653287; ANDRADE, José Higor Pereira de.
Resumo:
The demand for efficient construction methods that integrate quality, cost, time, and
sustainability has driven technological advancements. Structural masonry stands out in the
market due to its relatively lower cost. In response to the need for cost reduction,
comparative studies focus particularly on foundations to identify more effective solutions in
terms of materials and economy. In this context, a comparative analysis was conducted
between two types of foundations in structural masonry: mortar stone and strip footing with
isolated footings, with the aim of determining the most economical model. To achieve this,
a structural modulation of the building was developed to quantify the acting loads. The data
were used to size both foundations, varying loads and soil pressures to analyze different
scenarios. The comparison of quantities, based on SINAPI and SEINFRA/CE databases,
revealed that the mortar stone system is more economically viable in all scenarios studied
in this research. It is concluded that comparative studies are essential for decision-making,
aiming at cost reduction in construction projects.