GARCIA, Caroline.; GALINDO, Dolores Cristina Gomes.; LEITE, José Carlos.
Resumen:
In this essay we argue that the adoption of reenactment as a methodological experiment
allows a dramatic one that articulates unexpected effects to theoretical debates that,
from the point of view of the History of Sciences, would be closed, producing
rearticulations between politics, Science and Psychology. In order to approach reenactment
as a methodological resource, we take as a thread the debate about Bergson
and Einstein about time.. The debate between Bergson and Einstein in 1922 about time,
in which the former would have emerged as the defeated protagonist, without referring
to the solutions already instituted on the controversies is an important methodological
clue to avoid polarization and to get through the effects of the notion of time in the
present. The perspective of the actor-network theory on the study of controversies
allows to recover the epic debate of 1922 and to reinvent it by means of the
reenactment, therefore, in bringing the conception of network like flows, circulations,
alliances, movements, instead of referring to A crystallized entity, gives way to
reenactment as a thinking device.
