BEZERRA, Maria das Neves Guedes Cavalcanti.
Resumo:
The research aims to perform comparative analysis between contraceptives - IUD`s
used commercially. Within this objective we sought: to propose a comparative basis
between composition of TCu 380A IUD and Hormonal Endoception; determine the
possible oxidation of copper IUDs; determining the type of polyethylene used in both
IUD's. The research was conducted at the Laboratory of Biomaterials Evaluation and
Development of the Northeast - CERTBIO, located in the Academic Unit of Materials
Engineering, Federal University of Campina Grande / UFCG. TCu 380A and Sterile
Endoception: two samples of intrauterine devices commonly used, as described
below were used. Chemical compositions of IUDs and type of polyethylene were
evaluated using the following techniques: Optical Microscopy (OM), Scanning
Electron Microscopy (SEM / EDX) Spectroscopy in the Region with Infrared Fourier
Transform Spectroscopy (FTIR), X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Differential Scanning
Calorimetry (DSC). It can also prove from the EDS analysis the presence of barium
sulphate in both IUD's, where it was used to make the IUD visible on x-rays proved
the presence of silicium and oxygen in the stem of the IUD levonorgestrel indicating
that it comprises a polydimethylsiloxane as reported by the manufacturer. Can be
proved with FTIR analysis of the forming material of the principal of both bodies was
polyethylene IUD‟s for examining the spectrogram. XRD analysis corroborated the
results obtained with FTIR analysis of the material indicated that the devices it was
polyethylene having a typical PE spectrogram. One can also show that the wire rings
and the TCu 380 were composed of copper. The DSC analysis showed to be a
constituent of both polyethylene IUDs Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE). Given the
above it can be concluded that both IUDs have bodies formed of low density
polyethylene, but have different processing, where the structure of the IUD
levonorgestrel has finer surface finish compared to TCu 380 A.