ALVES, G. D.; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2738659686568009; ALVES, Gean Dias.
Resumen:
Quality education is essential for the development of a fair and equal society.
However, throughout history, especially in Brazil, such provision has not been
ensured in a way that meets these principles, particularly concerning the population
living in rural areas. In this context, Rural Education emerged from social struggles
and as a response to the historical educational inequalities suffered by rural
populations. In Brazil, education in rural areas has traditionally been marked by
neglect, with precarious infrastructure, little investment from the public sector, and
little appreciation of rural realities. In this scenario, Rural Education aims to bridge
this gap by promoting education that recognizes the countryside as a legitimate
space for living and knowledge, rescuing rural identity and the autonomy of rural
communities. This research sought to investigate the educational provision for rural
areas in the municipality of Nazarezinho - PB, aiming to analyze the conditions of
schools and the challenges faced by teachers and students in the context of rural
education. The work adopted the geographic analysis category of territory, based on
the conceptions of Haesbaert (2007) and Fernandes and Molina (2004). The
methodology had a qualitative-quantitative approach, combining bibliographic
research, document analysis, and semi-structured interviews with teachers working in
rural schools in the municipality. The results show a precarious situation in rural
schools, with limited infrastructure, lack of adequate pedagogical resources, and
difficulties faced by teachers, especially in dealing with multigrade classes.
Additionally, the process of closing rural schools stands out as a policy that
disarticulates communities and weakens the residents' connection to their territory.
This context compromises the social and educational development of the rural
population, perpetuating inequalities in relation to urban areas. The research also
discussed alternatives to face these challenges, focusing on curricular reorientation
as a way to try to stop the closure of rural schools, and, as a last resort, planned
nucleation. It was possible to conclude that it is essential to rethink the education
model offered in these areas, ensuring training that values the rural way of life and
promotes social inclusion and the development of rural regions.