OLIVEIRA, M. F. C.; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4989058126575922; OLIVEIRA, Maria de Fátima Carlos de.
Résumé:
Several mapping initiatives that aim to include local populations in map production
processes have spread throughout the world, especially since the 1990s. These are
peoples and communities in conflict situations that have been producing their own
maps, portraying their daily lives and their references, on a cartographic basis
(Acselrad, 2013). Currently, several experiences coexist that propose an alternative
iconography to that of the cartographic conventions considered official, and that
question not only “what is represented”, but also “how and why it is represented”,
investing in symbols and icons of symbolic and political value (inseparable dimensions)
for each group (Almeida, 2008). From this perspective, this research aimed to analyze
the actions promoted during the Social Cartography process promoted through
extension and scientific initiation actions of the university with the community of the
Padre Cleides Rural Settlement, located in the city of Santa Helena-PB, in the period
of 2023 and 2024, during the validity of these programs. Social Cartography allows us
to access participatory and collaborative methodologies that end up providing spaces
for learning and exchanging knowledge among the different subjects who participate
in the process of self-mapping, as well as bringing us closer to knowledge about the
territory that only the subjects of the community have. In this process, the map itself is
not the only result. By involving the community in the mapping process, social
cartography transforms the territory into a dynamic space for exchanging knowledge,
promoting dialogue between local knowledge and scientific practices, which
reverberate in a process of self-management of the peasant territory of the Padre
Cleides settlement. This approach is aligned with Santos' (2013) concept of ecology of
knowledge, which values the interaction between different forms of knowledge. The
structure of the chapters starts with the struggle for the community's land, goes through
the entire cartographic process until we reach a more critical analysis of the
possibilities of knowledge production that occurs from this exchange between the
community and the university, with an emphasis on the experience lived by the
researcher during the research.