O "dizer" na seara política: as condições de produção subjacentes ao discurso de posse da presidenta Dilma Rousseff.

Abstract

This monograph deals with the conditions of production present in the Possession Speech of President Dilma Rousseff. The Speech Analysis of French line was the theory basis of this work. Some main concepts served anchor, in order to understand how the conditions of production materialize in this discourse. The corpus analyzed was the Possession Speech of President Dilma Rousseff. Your access was via internet. This study adopted the induction method and structuralism method and how technical documentation indirect because the document already existed. The steps followed were: reading material, delimitation of the corpus, analysis of corpus and possible closing remarks. The objectives of this study were to identify the strategies of political speech in the present discourse in question; to realize in political speech the reflection of an conscious and elaborated activity that avoids possible setbacks; to recognize the assurance of the purposes of communication by the political actors; to apprehend the imaginary formations inherent to the analyzed speech, to identify the social, historical, cultural and ideological context. The intention of this work was to show that the political subject does not state anything she wishes. The conditionings mark him say, which tend to the dangers the underlying speech. Even if President Dilma Rousseff wanted to say certain sayings to the Brazilian people, the ideological formation, the discursive formation and the conditions of production prevent throughout its length. Before any announcement, President, Dilma Rousseff formulated pictures of herself, the Brazilian people and of her speech. This anticipation acts as a filter and tends to favor the good coexistence between the interlocutors. As much as the presidency is a function of prominence, saying the President is a result of subjection to the PT, those who supported and relied on her. Her freedom is limited. Thus, her saying constitutes a representation that must suit the enunciation. As a citizen, her views do not match what she speaks as a member of the political instance. Thence, in several moments of her speech, the President states in the name of the Brazilian nation. She avoids taking responsibility for her own statement.