FARIAS, A. C. A.; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5786012914574520; FARIAS, Angélica Carina de Andrade.
Resumo:
This work has the main objective of obtaining knowledge of how the relationship between
Internal Social Responsibility ( ISR ) and Internal Organizational Reputation ( IOR ) takes
place. In order to conclude the study, we used Pena et al. (2005) as a theoretical background,
forming a basis to investigate ISR through the analysis of 9 indicators, the same used by the
Ethos Institute for Business and Social Responsibility, and Lerner’s (2006) proposal in order
to identify the employees’ perception about the degree of agreement with IOR, based on the
perception of 8 attributes related to the company. Thus, we made an investigation at a
company called Antares Comunicação de Campina Grande, where we applied a semi-
structured interview with the manager of the company’s Social Responsibility Programme.
We also applied a questionnaire with the employees of the company. Through this
documentary research we were able to identify the ISR actions which were developed, as well
as the employees’ perception of them, the identification of the agreement degree in relation to
the IOR, and the analysis of the relationship between them. The analysis result show a high
degree of agreement, with the average of 5.5 in relation to the ISR action developed by the
company, as well as the average of 4.9 for the attributes related to the IOR. Still, it was
possible to observe, through Pearson’s correlation analysis, in this case, that there is a
significant positive linear relation between ISR and IOR. This all means that the greater the
perception of the ISR actions, the more positive will the IOR be among the employees. Thus,
according to Resource-based View (RBV), the two variables, namely, Internal Social
Responsibility and Internal Organizational Reputation, can be considered sources of
competitive advantage